|
For Immediate Release |
| March 9, 2003 | |
| Contact: Carol McKay | |
| 202-835-3323 ext.114 | |
| media@nclnet.org |
NCL Letter to Senate Committee on HELP Cautioning Against Hasty RX to OTC Switches
March 6, 2003
The Honorable Judd Gregg, Chairman
Senate Committee on HELP
SH-835 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Gregg:
We are writing today to urge you to conduct hearings to ensure that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues its long standing policy of providing sufficient time for post market surveillance of drugs introduced in the marketplace. The FDA policy has been not to approve a switch of a prescription drug to OTC status until there is sufficient marketing experience as a prescription product, typically at least five years, to ensure that patient and public health will not be adversely impacted. The purpose of this practice is to ensure that a drug has had sufficient use under physician supervision in a large population to enable potentially serious adverse reactions and side effects to materialize and be detected before a drug is approved for self-medication and OTC sale. Reactions that may occur due to chronic or repeated exposure only can be uncovered over a substantial period of time. Clinical trials required for initial product approval do not involve sufficient numbers of patients (typically less than 2,000) or any chronic or repeated exposure to evaluate low-incidence events or latent events, no matter how serious. While such limited studies may well establish a degree of safety and efficacy and a favorable risk/benefit ratio for patients under direct physician supervision, it is essential that additional experience be acquired before physician oversight and attention to potential side effects is removed.
On
NCL is also troubled that various elements of the current labeling for these products include special dosage recommendations for patients with decreased renal function, cautions against overdosage, and recommendations to physicians about patients with conditions other than allergy. NCL believes that an OTC switch may result in chronic continuous use by some patients with a drug that has only gone through clinical trials and has not been in the marketplace long enough to determine its safety as an over-the-counter medication. Another concern is drug-to-drug interaction between OTC antihistamines and other OTC medications, including antacids.
NCL is very concerned with profound consequences to consumers’ ability to treat allergies if these drugs are forced by FDA to move OTC. FDA’s recent approval of Claritin® for OTC sale at the request of its manufacturer provides consumers with an important choice of self-medicating. This choice will enable allergy sufferers to optimize their treatment with nonsedating antihistamines and permit those who require further physician contact for the treatment of their condition to do so. The action of switching these products OTC as well as the decision by many HMOs and major insurers to remove all nonsedating antihistamines from their formularies or to place Rx nonsedating antihistamines in high-copay categories in the wake of Claritin’s OTC availability jeopardizes the choice for consumers and potentially severs important patient-physician dialogue. The potential elimination of a prescription option for consumers will shift costs from health plans back onto consumers, substantially increasing consumers’ out-of-pocket costs for use of these particular, and necessary, treatments.
Finally, it is simply not within the scope of FDA’s mission to unilaterally manage such a significant shift in national policy on prescription versus OTC availability of drug products. NCL urges your committee to conduct an oversight hearing into FDA’s policies and actual practices in considering requests to switch individual drugs and/or whole families of drugs from prescription to OTC status.
Very truly yours,
LINDA F. GOLODNER
President
The
National Consumers League,
founded in 1899, is
###
###